A movie about survival, a story based on the evacuation and not on the ‘Battle of Dunkirk’. Chris Nolan took a piece of a historical event happened during WWII and converted into a brilliant movie.
Highlights: Wonderful
editing and Innovative Screenplay - what Nolan films are constantly best at.
Supporting actors are
sprinkled all over. The characters are not developed well; therefore I couldn’t
care much about any of them except Tom Hardy.
Hans Zimmer’s
soundtracks are pure bliss to hearing organs as it has always been.
A movie must balance
the two key factors, style and substance. Even if one goes out of proportion,
then it may lead to the downfall of entire work. I think Dunkirk balances both
style and substance at the same level. A bit more of style than substance to be
precise, kudos to the cinematography genius Hoyte van Hoytema and those high
resolution IMAX film cameras.
Overall, a spectacular
job from the crew. Many accolades await them.
Reducing the dialogues
and focusing more on the conflict was a smart move, which was previously done
by Kubrick and Spielberg in their works. It’s good to see Nolan following their
footsteps. I wouldn't even mind if the dialogues were completely reduced. This
has so much potential to be a great silent film.
Apart from a single
quote in the 3rd act, the film casually ignores the French involvement in the
evacuation. Well... this is an English movie at a Hollywood budget and does the
job as so. It’s such a shame on how the movie shows the whole incident just
from the British perspective. If another 20 minutes was dedicated to the
French’s contribution, the movie would have been monumental. That being said,
this is nothing new, usual Hollywood recipe.
2hrs and 30 minutes is
the average runtime of a typical Nolan film. To compare it with this 1hr 50 minutes
war drama, along with these undeveloped characters struggling for their
survival -VOID - The miracle in the climax
was supposed to give us goosebumps or at least something to cheer but in end, I
couldn’t feel anything other than emptiness. There is no doubt that the film
was crafted well (both visually and the way story was told) but what use does
it have when it lacks emotions? This is a war film. Give us some gore,
bloodshed, real struggle, pain to witness Mr. Nolan. Make us uncomfortable, feel
pity. We don’t want extras lying around pretending dead. These are the areas where
Black Hawk Down and Saving Private Ryan really shine.
Did Nolan reach the
heights of S Kubrick? Definitely not, there is not even a comparison, not yet.
I would still pick Dr. Strangelove over Dunkirk any day. There are many
positives to be noted from this 110 minute lesson for the aspiring writers and
filmmakers. But also few negatives Nolan must make a note for himself.
Dunkirk is a classic
and will remain so, for the years to come, at least from the Hollywood and
British point of view.
This is one of the
good movies of this year, if not the best and that’s my opinion.
A solid ⭐⭐⭐⭐⛥.
Nothing more, nothing
less.